Fresher(24-35)

Exactly. I would actually make 24–35 freshers a separate group, because their situation is quite different from both students and mid-career workers.

The interesting point is that the old formula:

Degree → Fresher job → Experience → Career growth

is becoming:

Degree + AI literacy + practical portfolio + adaptability + human skills → Entry into an unfamiliar job market

And there is an important paradox: AI may make the fresher more powerful, but it may also make the fresher’s entry-level job harder to get.

Why? Some tasks that were traditionally given to fresh graduates for learning—basic coding, documentation, testing, research, content preparation, data analysis, customer support, etc.—can increasingly be assisted by AI.

So the fresher cannot simply say:

> “I have a degree.”



Nor is:

> “I know ChatGPT.”



enough.

The new fresher should become a “demonstrated capability” person

Instead of:

Degree → Certificate → Job

we should encourage:

Degree → AI capability → Projects → Real-world experience → Portfolio → Job

For example, a Computer Science graduate shouldn’t merely say:

> “I know Python and AI.”



They should be able to demonstrate:

> “Here is a real problem I solved using Python + AI. Here is my reasoning, the limitations, how I tested it, and what I learned.”



That difference could become enormous.

And this gives us another age-group question

24–35: “How do I enter and establish myself in an AI-disrupted world?”

Then our overall framework becomes wonderfully complete:

Age Central question

16–24 How do I grow and experience life in an AI world?
24–35 How do I enter and establish my career?
35–50 How do I reskill/reinvent when technology changes my job?
50–65 How do I remain productive, employable and financially independent?
60+/65+ How do I live, learn, connect and contribute in an AI world?


And there is one beautiful common thread:

Young people need experience.
Middle-aged people need reinvention.
Older people need connection and purpose.

AI can assist all three—but it cannot supply the human experience itself.

This could become a very meaningful “Human Life in the AI Age” framework rather than just a technology course.